Topic: Gathering thread of what is disturbing on the website
kaputtnik Topic Opener |
Posted at: 2015-09-04, 21:06
This thread is just for little thinks that let you make "oh, looks bad" here on the website. My personal intention is:
If i am working on the css there are maybe other little things that make you think: "could be better". So it's up to you right now to make suggestions Top Quote |
||||||||||||||||||||
GunChleoc |
Posted at: 2015-09-05, 07:58
One thing you could check for is if there are any layout tables used, or it it's all done by CSS. Basically, check out how the site looks when you take the CSS away - this is important for people with visual impairment who use screen readers. Content tables are ok, e.g. when somebody uses markup to create a table. Busy indexing nil values Top Quote |
||||||||||||||||||||
kaputtnik Topic Opener |
Posted at: 2015-09-16, 23:57
There are no tables used for layout. Except for displaying formulars on some places or for the forum posts/maps There is a branch available now. Top Quote |
||||||||||||||||||||
kaputtnik Topic Opener |
Posted at: 2015-09-19, 14:34
Some screenshots: Tables in ForumNow:
New: Paragraphs and headersI've took a screenshot from a latest post from king_of_nowhere: The space between paragraphs could may be greater? washy bold texts
You may notice that i changed the color of headers a bit. I did this, because otherwise the shadowing of headers looks much more blurred. In general: These screenshots are taken with my new laptop and the new font sizes depends on the browser settings. So firefox on my new laptop has a general font size of 16pixel. All font sizes are calculated to this base size of 16 pixel. F.e. the bold usernames in above screenshot are calculated to a size of 11.5167px (original size: 12px) and the font size for normal texts in forum posts are calculated to 14.4px (Original: 14px). Top Quote |
||||||||||||||||||||
GunChleoc |
Posted at: 2015-09-19, 18:57
I think that the distance between paragraphs looks good now. In the screenshot of the latest posts box, we somehow lost the dark shading - the text would be easier to read if we could get it back. Busy indexing nil values Top Quote |
||||||||||||||||||||
kaputtnik Topic Opener |
Posted at: 2015-09-19, 19:38
Thanks for reply Oh i didn't notice this shadow... but it's no problem:
It looks much sharp this way Top Quote |
||||||||||||||||||||
GunChleoc |
Posted at: 2015-09-20, 09:57
It does Could you add a shadow to the non-highlighted (white) text as well? ETA: What I find annoying on the forum is that when I post something, the thread is marked as unread. There should be an update done to the timestamp - of course, we also need to consider cross-posting here, so it might not be as easy to implement as it sounds. Edited: 2015-09-20, 10:27
Busy indexing nil values Top Quote |
||||||||||||||||||||
kaputtnik Topic Opener |
Posted at: 2015-09-20, 13:24
The changes i've made to text shadow are now reverted, so all texts are shadowed like it is now. The font-sizes are also fine adjusted. I make some further tests and will update the branch if i am ready.
This topic is currently marked as "read" for me, i will see if it is marked as unread after writing this post. Top Quote |
||||||||||||||||||||
kaputtnik Topic Opener |
Posted at: 2015-09-20, 13:35
Sorry i couldn't confirm this. After writing the post the topic is marked as read (like before). Could you please explain a bit more? Maybe a stupid question: You didn't go back in browsers history? Top Quote |
||||||||||||||||||||
GunChleoc |
Posted at: 2015-09-20, 15:30
I can't reproduce this now - maybe I was as daft as that Edited: 2015-09-20, 15:31
Busy indexing nil values Top Quote |