Topic: Some beginner's questions
caillean Topic Opener |
Posted at: 2010-08-04, 11:56
Hi Wideland-folks! Since I'm new here, first and foremost thank you to all developers and participants of this project. I never played Settlers or anything like that before, but since I came across Widelands in my distro's repositories, I had a lot of fun playing! A great game, again, my compliments. I played around with the editor as well, and would really like to create an own map. Perhaps somebody with experience in this could answer some questions?
I'd really like to make something well-wrought and with a lot passion for detail, so I'd be grateful for your advices! So long, Caillean Top Quote |
SirVer |
Posted at: 2010-08-04, 12:48
Hi,
thanks :).
bigger maps should not much affect game speed. They need significantly more memory though while running. The most impacts on speed are the number of AI enemies and objects (houses, animals, workers) in total.
no, not currently.
There is a maximum Value for resources. I always place maximum amounts of resources as I see this most fitting for playing.
If something good comes from it, make sure to upload it here on the site !SirVer Top Quote |
caillean Topic Opener |
Posted at: 2010-08-04, 13:21
Hey, thanks for the quick reply!
Would you think that something really -huge- like 400 x 400 will work out okay? Would provide plenty of landscape to explore for people who actually enjoy the "settler-thing" (I mean 'settler' in the proper meaning of the word, no reference to the game).
Okay, that's a good starting point. Perhaps I'd make gold somewhat more rare...
Of course, would be nice to give something back! Greetings, Caillean Edited: 2010-08-04, 13:25
Top Quote |
ixprefect |
Posted at: 2010-08-24, 17:12
Yes, something of size around 400x400 is supposed to be unproblematic. I wouldn't be surprised if you ran into some performance issues while playing on such a large map, but we'd generally be interested to hear about them so that they can be fixed. Top Quote |
eddieballgame |
Posted at: 2012-06-17, 19:02
Hi...have been playing on 512x512 random maps vs 8 ( multi & single ) with no performance issues. Would like to add that the stability is simply great. No crashes to date, simply unheard of. Admittedly smaller maps are prferable if one wants "quicker" action vs opponenets, plus it makes planning your empire much more crucial. The smallest random map for 8 players seems to be 192x192. btw...I am using a "laptop". Edited: 2012-06-17, 19:03
Top Quote |
neon |
Posted at: 2012-06-19, 01:58
Hi another noob question. can I zoom in and out in the editor? would be great to gain more overview! My fishb-reeder breeds fish and throws them in the ocean so my fisher has work. That's what I call creating jobs!!! Top Quote |
wl-zocker |
Posted at: 2012-06-19, 08:51
That is not (yet) implemented, but other players have already had the same idea, so maybe it comes soon ... See http://wl.widelands.org/forum/topic/1029/?page=1 for more information. (And please use the search function before asking questions. "editor zoom" offers two pages (plus this one), so you could have found the page yourself.) "Only few people know how much one has to know in order to know how little one knows." - Werner Heisenberg Top Quote |