Topic: Wares Icon size

41 — 48 of 48 Posts ‹‹ previous 1 2 3 4 5

chuckw Joined: 2010-03-15, 16:23 Posts: 945 One Elder of Players Location: New York - USA	Posted at: 2011-03-17, 18:18 Here AGAIN for comparison are the existing stone and marble images (idle/menu) as PNGs and as they would appear in the game. Atlant stone: , Emp marble: , Empire stone: , Barb rawstone Now the candidates for the iron, assuming the gold is acceptable: Iron1: , Iron2: , Iron3: , Iron4: Iron#4 too blue? How is this? Iron5: Note: If you wish, you can copy these images and try them in the game yourself! (In Firefox, Right-click/Save Image As) EDIT: (I think the best coordinates for the hotspot will be 4 10 for Atlanteans and Barbarians, 6 10 for Empire.) Now I would rank them (most favorite-to-least): 5,1,4,2,3 Edited: 2011-03-17, 22:54 I see little people. Top Quote

Astuur Topic Opener Joined: 2009-02-28, 10:08 Posts: 733 One Elder of Players Location: Frankfurt / Germany	Posted at: 2011-03-17, 19:30 1, 4 (though it's a bit too blue) :), 2, 3 Yeah, that's what you get for all you're trouble. Ask 10 people and end up with 12 opinions! As for "blue tint" I had something in mind like this or even less blue than that. BTW: The transparency still didn't make it when I grabbed your ingot, so this one is opaque. Ahhh... your last one came while I was looking up the markdown syntax.... that's it! (for my taste) 5,1,4,2,3 Chuck, you're the graphics elder for a reason. Honoestly; I don't care whidh one you choose. Edited: 2011-03-17, 19:33 Being no programmer, I apologize for all my suggestions that imply undue workload and for other misjudgements due to lack of expertise or relevant skills. I am on Win32, have no means to compile, and rely on prefabricated distributions (Thanks to Tino). Top Quote

Venatrix Joined: 2010-10-05, 20:31 Posts: 447 Tribe Member Location: Germany	Posted at: 2011-03-17, 19:35 Yes, 5 is better than 4 and can better be distinguished from stone than 1. So I rank them 5,1,2,(3,4) now. Two is the oddest prime. Top Quote

chuckw Joined: 2010-03-15, 16:23 Posts: 945 One Elder of Players Location: New York - USA	Posted at: 2011-03-23, 14:11 It's 23 March, and as I stated in post #4618, the deadline for this discussion if we want to get any changes in for build 16rc. That said, I am of the impression that the majority: prefer the ingots over the current images for gold and iron in all tribes prefer the images Chuck has proposed favor version #5 of Chuck's iron ingot image So I will ready them to be pushed. I see little people. Top Quote

chuckw Joined: 2010-03-15, 16:23 Posts: 945 One Elder of Players Location: New York - USA	Posted at: 2011-03-23, 15:29 The new ingots are in the game with rev #5892! I see little people. Top Quote

fraang Joined: 2010-02-15, 13:13 Posts: 239 Widelands-Forum-Junkie	Posted at: 2011-03-23, 15:35 Stone: Looks great but the outline of the atlantean and empire stone doesn't fit to the rest of the icons. I would remove it. Iron: I like the number 5 (Chuck's one) best. All in all really nice work! Top Quote

Astuur Topic Opener Joined: 2009-02-28, 10:08 Posts: 733 One Elder of Players Location: Frankfurt / Germany	Posted at: 2011-03-23, 18:44 Yep, looking forward to your ingots Being no programmer, I apologize for all my suggestions that imply undue workload and for other misjudgements due to lack of expertise or relevant skills. I am on Win32, have no means to compile, and rely on prefabricated distributions (Thanks to Tino). Top Quote

chuckw Joined: 2010-03-15, 16:23 Posts: 945 One Elder of Players Location: New York - USA	Posted at: 2011-03-23, 19:15 Astuur wrote: Yep, looking forward to your ingots Make that "OUR ingots". I see little people. Top Quote

‹‹ previous 1 2 3 4 5