Topic: Move Widelands to GitHub
stonerl |
Posted at: 2019-10-29, 18:23
I forked the widelands-repo, so I can restore them. I did restore the balancing branch. Any branches in particular that need to be restored ASAP? @all please, never ever force push to origin until you sure about the implications. Top Quote |
stonerl |
Posted at: 2019-10-29, 18:25
@hessenfarmer you don't need to pull the entire repo, only branches you are working on. Top Quote |
hessenfarmer |
Posted at: 2019-10-29, 20:51
As far as I understood the wiki primer my fork is referenced as origin the master repo is referenced as upstream. So basically I push my changes to origin (my fork) and then make a pull request to merge them into the correlating branch in the master (upstream) repo. I believe this should be the standard way of doing it. Am I right? Top Quote |
hessenfarmer |
Posted at: 2019-10-29, 20:53
I am not sure if I know how to differentiate these options. I feel it really hard to get used to git workflow. Top Quote |
stonerl |
Posted at: 2019-11-05, 14:37
I restored all old branches. Top Quote |
hessenfarmer |
Posted at: 2019-11-05, 16:45
many thanks for doing this Top Quote |
hessenfarmer |
Posted at: 2019-12-06, 15:44
Now that I have become somewhat used to how to get things done on git, I'd like to ask some specific questions. I have started scrolling through the issues taken over from bazaar. Some of them might have been fixed "accidentally" on the fly. Is there a possibility to link them to the respective branch/commit? How do we close them? I would like to have at least a 4-eyes principle applied on this. Top Quote |
stonerl |
Posted at: 2019-12-06, 15:50
If you want to link a bug to a commit or branch juts add Top Quote |
hessenfarmer |
Posted at: 2019-12-06, 16:18
Can this be done in retrospective? How about other issues for which we know they are fixed or no longer reproducable? Top Quote |
stonerl |
Posted at: 2019-12-06, 16:23
We could reference the PR in the bug report.
Or you reference the commit:
Top Quote |